Subject: Re: the path from nathanw_sa -> newlock2
To: None <>
From: Bucky Katz <>
List: current-users
Date: 02/15/2007 15:18:17
Michael Lorenz <> writes:

>> But the other aspect of our staying in -current was my (possiblly
>> incorrect) understanding that if we submitted new bits, such as the
>> USB device subsystem, they'd go in current and not a stable branch.
> They'd go first into -current.
>> Given that you now know that we intend to submit some large chunks of
>> functionality should we be working in -current?
> That would certainly be easier for us.

And, I think, for us as well.

Can this thread serve as us putting y'all on notice that we've still
go big changes we'd like to contribute, or should I wander over to
tech-kern and mention the list there?