Subject: Re: the path from nathanw_sa -> newlock2
To: Bucky Katz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Michael Lorenz <email@example.com>
Date: 02/15/2007 15:37:59
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Feb 15, 2007, at 13:45, Bucky Katz wrote:
> Ben Harris <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> I feel I should point out that there is no "arm port maintainer".
>> The "port-arm-maintainer" email alias just points to all of the port
>> maintainers of the individual ARM-based ports. I can't speak for
>> the rest of them, but the reason I didn't commit your patches is
>> that they lay a long way outside my area of competency.
> So http://netbsd.org/People/port-maintainers.html is a polite fiction,
It doesn't mention a port-arm maintainer, only maintainers of the
individual ARM-based ports, just as Ben said. I have no idea how that
would make it a 'polite fiction'.
> Perhaps that web page should be removed if there are no port
Please stick with the facts - nobody said such a thing.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----