On Feb 15, 2007, at 10:45 AM, Bucky Katz wrote:

> Ben Harris <bjh21@netbsd.org> writes:
>
>> I feel I should point out that there is no "arm port maintainer".
>> The "port-arm-maintainer" email alias just points to all of the port
>> maintainers of the individual ARM-based ports.  I can't speak for
>> the rest of them, but the reason I didn't commit your patches is
>> that they lay a long way outside my area of competency.
>
> So http://netbsd.org/People/port-maintainers.html is a polite fiction,
> then?
>
> Perhaps that web page should be removed if there are no port
> maintainers.

But if you look at that list, there is no "arm" maintainer.  Nor are  
there mips, m68k, powerpc, sh3 maintainers.  Maybe there should be.