> > In view of my own lack of expertise in this area, I'll hold off
> > on answering that one for the time being, though my guess is that
> > it's probably a "yes".
> >
> > Meanwhile, I've adapted your patch to -current, foldet to 80
> > coloumns, and added a comment -- diff attached.
>
>    Thanks.  One small note.  It's >=3D "stepping" C0, which is revisi=
on  =

> 0x03.  Changing either word in the comment you added would make it  =

> less confusing.

OK, I reversed the test, and after getting a nudge to commit this
from a co-developer, that's what I've just done.  Many thanks for
finding the source of this problem and the fix!

Regards,

- H=E5vard