YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:

> i still don't think it's a great idea to pass curproc everywhere
> for aesthetic reasons.
> 
> given that it seems that the bug is annoying people,
> how about postponing this discussion and fixing the problem using
> curproc for now?  ie. a minimal fix.

we can do that.

(fwiw, since the solution may present an inconsistent kpi between the
trunk and netbsd-4, we should probably decide on the correct way to fix
this before the official release. :)

-e.