Subject: Re: cgd failure since hackathon
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Christian Biere <email@example.com>
Date: 11/30/2006 21:44:23
Quentin Garnier wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 08:21:09PM +0100, Christian Biere wrote:
> > Quentin Garnier wrote:
> > > Anyone objects? The size_t -> ssize_t is necessary to avoid
> > > signed/unsigned mismatch, if we ever want to warn on that (I thought we
> > > did, though).
> > Why not the smaller fix?
> I don't see any good reason not to make ci_blocksize a ssize_t.
Unsigned arithmetic is less error-prone, IMHO. Negative buffer sizes?
Does NetBSD run on blackholes?