On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 02:32:13PM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 20:18 +0000, Patrick Welche wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 11:40:14AM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 11:10 +0100, Adam wrote:
> > > 
> > > > By the way, is there a reason we don't have f77 anymore? :)
> > > 
> > > Because there is no f77 in gcc-4.  It's in the process of being replaced
> > > with f95; but that's still somewhat of a work-in-progress.
> > 
> > What of gfortran?
> 
> gfortran is an f95 compiler.

OK, to rephrase that:

tape2: {15} gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-unknown-netbsdelf3.99.19
Configured with: /usr/src/local/gcc/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc4 --enable-languages=c,c++,java,fortran --with-mpfr=/usr/local --with-gmp=/usr/local --with-system-zlib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.0 20060519 (experimental)

was good enough to compile Siesta, so "Is there a reason we don't have
gfortran?"

Cheers,

Patrick