--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 03:56:33PM +0200, KlinT wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> Thanks for such a quick answer ...
>=20
> Le 20 sept. 06 ? 15:26, Thomas E. Spanjaard a ?crit :
>=20
> >I think that's unrelated. Read the log message. Uebayashi's patch =20
> >does fix things, though: see =20
> >20060920.191421.104033642.uebayasi@brains.co.jp.
>=20
> This is an EMail adress ... Not a link :(

Actually, it's not an EMail address. You're right it's not a link.

It's a message ID.

If you look at the headers in the message you sent, you'll find:

In-Reply-To: <45114183.5040304@netphreax.net>
References: <36E616D4-48C9-43F7-83B8-4F6688FE5468@klintcentral.net>
<4D0AE48D-CCE7-4150-A1C8-4A9D5AC96C20@klintcentral.net>
<274190120609200619h2db98df8o3aa76e35e30992f0@mail.gmail.com>
<45114183.5040304@netphreax.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1; delsp=3Dyes; format=3Dflowed
Message-Id: <3A9C169F-500D-48E1-98DD-42614DD18D13@klintcentral.net>

The Message-Id: line gives an ID to your message.=20

Your mail system generates different message IDs than uebayasi's sytem=20
did, so they look a little different. Yours uses lots of hex, brains.co.jp=
=20
uses decimal. But it all serves the same purpose.

The advantage of using a message ID from an EMail for identifying the=20
EMail is that it is a unique property of the message. Regardless of the=20
system that archives the EMail, the message ID stays the same. So you can=
=20
always find the right message.

Take care,

Bill

--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFFEXLQWz+3JHUci9cRAmqRAJ9N8C9+dRe8nLVtOV1tvjb6my1hTgCffJ+H
S8XvBnyrrWILrbQLu/a0gDU=
=HwI9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q--