On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 10:25:08PM +0100, Mike Pumford wrote:
> Mike Pumford wrote:
> 
> Looks like there are some additional patches needed to cope with the 
> more agressive optimiser in GCC4. Attached is the patch to actually make 
> the kernel run (without several devices failing to probe).

Woudn't it be better to dereference a pointer to a volatile memory location
inside the loop - that way the compiler isn't allowed to optimise the
loop away.

	David

-- 
David Laight: david@l8s.co.uk