Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/distrib/sets/lists
To: Douglas Wade Needham <cinnion@ka8zrt.com>
From: Brett Lymn <blymn@baesystems.com.au>
List: current-users
Date: 06/02/2006 21:38:52
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 01:16:29PM -0400, Douglas Wade Needham wrote:
> 
> What I will say is that at this point, I
> certainly cannot see any reason a discussion about the possible
> removal of sendmail could not have been carried out on a list such as
> this, just as other feature changes are often discussed.
>

The issue was discussed.  Unfortunately sendmail vs others is one of
those polarising issues.  There really is no "right" solution, there
will always be a group of people that will be disenfranchised whatever
way this went.  I suspect most people will be happy just to have a MTA
that forwards their mail, for the people that require a specific
feature set then there is always pkgsrc - if that doesn't cut it I am
sure that sendmail builds from source without any hassle.

FWIW my preference would have been to leave sendmail in the tree but
the it was decided it should go.  I shall get over it - pkgsrc or hand
built will do me.

-- 
Brett Lymn