Subject: Re: LFS status?
To: Konrad Schroder <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Bill Studenmund <email@example.com>
Date: 05/03/2006 13:40:06
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 03:45:33PM -0700, Konrad Schroder wrote:
> On Tue, 2 May 2006, Geert Hendrickx wrote:
> The deadlocks are being addressed as they come up; the most irritating on=
> at present is that I implemented the "release the snapshot" mechanism as =
> fcntl, and fcntl locks a vnode which might be locked by the cleaner while=
> it waits for the "release the snapshot" signal. What I really want is a=
> generic fsctl(2) that doesn't deal with a vnode at all...but I digress.
It probably wouldn't hurt to make VOP_FCNTL take an unlocked vnode.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----