Subject: Re: LFS status?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/03/2006 00:36:08
In article <Pine.NEB.email@example.com>,
Konrad Schroder <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>Now, of course we want roll-forward if we are confident that it works; and
>cleaning up allocated inodes with zero link count would also be nice.
>(Zero link inodes don't represent a faulty filesystem---think
>tmpfile(3)---but because the crash never closes the files properly it will
>lose space over time.) I haven't yet made the checkpoint-checking test
>roll forward through the non-checkpoint writes to verify the roll-forward
>code in fsck_lfs, though that's definitely on the agenda. The in-kernel
>roll-forward code does not work and should probably be scrapped.
But don't you need this for root?