Subject: Re: ath(4) and stealth AP
To: Rui Paulo <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Steven M. Bellovin <email@example.com>
Date: 04/19/2006 13:46:43
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006 17:50:37 +0100, Rui Paulo <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Is the channel marked for passive scan only?
> I think it was for active scan (if you mean scan_ssid=1), but I'm
> packaging and I already shut down the box..
I can test tonight with an ath interface compiled from yesterday's
source. I don't know the US regulatory constraints -- what should I
expect to happen?
--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb