Subject: Re: CARP Patch
To: Marcin Jessa <email@example.com>
From: Liam J. Foy <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/01/2006 14:59:13
On 15:52, Wed 01 Mar 06, Marcin Jessa wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 13:49:21 +0100
> Marcin Jessa <email@example.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 13:39:17 +0100
> > Quentin Garnier <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 01:19:34PM +0100, Marcin Jessa wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 09:47:28 +0000
> > > > "Liam J. Foy" <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > > > Here is a quick example to get CARP working once the patch has
> > > > > been applied and compiled:
> > > > >
> > > > > (Add 'pseudo-device carp' to kernel and re-build)
> > > >
> > > > Adding pseudo-device carp to my kernel config gives me:
> > >
> > > That's because the patch includes the addition of the device to
> > > GENERIC.local.
> > Ah right, the email did not mention it.
> > In that case it compiled fine. The error I described in my last email
> > about vhid is propably due to ifconfig not being in sync with the
> > kernel. Compiling new distribution now.
> Yepp, I was right.
> The new ifconfig binary fixed my issue and I could successfully set up
> carp. I will do more testing later today.
Liam J. Foy