Subject: Re: build.sh iso-image
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: David Young <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/21/2006 11:21:02
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 10:49:17PM +0000, Gavan Fantom wrote:
> Alan Barrett wrote:
> >On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> >>That's good to know and I'll flag your note so I can find it easily in
> >>the future. That said, I'll repeat my original suggestion: is there
> >>any reason it shouldn't be a target in build.sh, to be used after
> >You could try this patch, which has been in my private tree for
> >some time. Sorry there's no update to BUILDING.
> This looks like it would be worth committing. Is there any reason not to
> commit it?
I don't think it should be committed until the iso-image target uses
host tools---i.e., uses makefs instead of mkisofs.
David Young OJC Technologies
email@example.com Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933