Subject: Re: iso-image
To: None <>
From: David Young <>
List: current-users
Date: 01/21/2006 11:21:02
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 10:49:17PM +0000, Gavan Fantom wrote:
> Alan Barrett wrote:
> >On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> >
> >>That's good to know and I'll flag your note so I can find it easily in 
> >>the future.  That said, I'll repeat my original suggestion: is there 
> >>any reason it shouldn't be a target in, to be used after 
> >>'distribution'?
> >
> >
> >You could try this patch, which has been in my private tree for
> >some time.  Sorry there's no update to BUILDING.
> This looks like it would be worth committing. Is there any reason not to 
> commit it?

I don't think it should be committed until the iso-image target uses
host tools---i.e., uses makefs instead of mkisofs.


David Young             OJC Technologies      Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933