Subject: Re: sets compression
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Pavel Cahyna <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/07/2005 08:41:59
On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 12:06:16PM +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
> Personally, I think we should stick with gzip for sets, but maybe we
> have an option for using bzip2 so people who want to use it locally can?
Could the binary sets be compressed with gzip and source sets with bzip2?
If somebody wants to spend time on compiling from source, he could also
accept the overhead of bzip2 decompression?