Subject: Re: MFS vs TMPFS
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jed Davis <email@example.com>
Date: 10/10/2005 21:23:21
Gavan Fantom <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> thilo wrote:
>> Is there any advantage of tmpfs if I need mfs to boot the root-filesystem?
>> (at least I can reuse mfs in /tmp later on)
> Perhaps you're thinking of md(4), rather than mfs? They're different
> beasts altogether.
FWIW, FreeBSD 5 replaced mfs with a wrapper around md(4), so people
coming from that background might be more likely to be confused about
(let ((C call-with-current-continuation)) (apply (lambda (x y) (x y)) (map
((lambda (r) ((C C) (lambda (s) (r (lambda l (apply (s s) l)))))) (lambda
(f) (lambda (l) (if (null? l) C (lambda (k) (display (car l)) ((f (cdr l))
(C k))))))) '((#\J #\d #\D #\v #\s) (#\e #\space #\a #\i #\newline)))))