Subject: Re: build (compiling libpam) fails
To: Teemu Rinta-aho <email@example.com>
From: Teemu Rinta-aho <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/10/2005 13:30:50
Teemu Rinta-aho wrote:
> Rui Paulo wrote:
>> On 2005.10.10 12:58:39 +0300, Teemu Rinta-aho wrote:
>> | # compile libpam/openpam_get_option.ln
>> | CC=/usr/obj/tools/bin/i386--netbsdelf-gcc |
>> | t -chapbxzF -Sw -X 233 -d /usr/obj/usr/src/destdir.i386/usr/include
>> | -DLIB_MAJ=0
>> | -DOPENPAM_STATIC_MODULES -DOPENPAM_STATIC_MODULE -i |
>> | b/openpam_get_option.c
>> | /usr/src/dist/openpam/lib/openpam_get_option.c(68): syntax error 
>> | /usr/src/dist/openpam/lib/openpam_get_option.c(71): warning:
>> function | openpam_ge
>> | t_option falls off bottom without returning value 
>> Can you show me these two lines ?
>> -- Rui Paulo
> Well unless CVS has freaked, they're as they should be in v1.2.
> Here's the whole file excluding the copyright. I checked that
> RETURNS() has been defined in openpam_impl.h.
Well, looking more than 1 second at the file made me want
to delete the whole file and run cvs update :-)
Problem solved. Although now I wonder, what other local files
might be corrupted even that CVS says they're up to date!
A veeryy loooooong minus to CVS!
email@example.com -+- http://www.rinta-aho.org