Subject: Re: MFS vs TMPFS
To: thilo <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: George Michaelson <email@example.com>
Date: 10/06/2005 09:25:08
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 20:45:16 +1000
thilo <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Is there any advantage of tmpfs if I need mfs to boot the
> (at least I can reuse mfs in /tmp later on)
I believe that its expected if tmpfs is 'better' then it will become
able to manage the boot/root fs dependency in the kernel.
Why wouldn't you make the transition? If its VFS abstracted, isn't it
all the same thing in the end?