Subject: Re: altq api for ipf and pf
To: None <>
From: Peter Eisch <>
List: current-users
Date: 09/26/2005 08:09:09
On 9/26/05 5:40 AM, "Thomas E. Spanjaard" <> wrote:

> I am not, I am saying that 'an' ALTQ is included in base. The fact that
> it is, makes me believe that currently it is deemed 'good enough'. Of
> course, there's a thin line between not enough relevant people caring
> and believing it's good enough.

I'm running it (2.0 systems) on several relevant systems to me.  I doubt
that I'm one of the relevant people though.