Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 2005.09.20 12:06:02 +0200, Hauke Fath wrote:
> | Rui Paulo wrote:
> | >On 2005.09.20 10:19:32 +0200, Hauke Fath wrote:
> | >| Hi,
> | >| 
> | >| am-utils is at v6.1.2.1 now 
> | >| (http://www.am-utils.org/docs/am-utils/NEWS.txt), while we ship 6.1rc2, 
> | >| according to doc/3RDPARTY. Is there any chance of seeing the most recent 
> | >| 6.1.x release on netbsd-3?
> | >
> | >Is it stable? I don't think we will see it in 3.0.
> | 
> | It's a release whereas what we have in -current is a release candidate. 
> | And it has important bug fixes.
> 
> Yes, but it must be imported into -current before 3.0. 

Sure - I took that for granted. :)

> I suppose that
> if we want to import it to the netbsd-3 branch it will probably be on
> the 3.1 release, not the 3.0 as it's a bit too late for that.

Quite. Note that I said 'netbsd-3' as in 'branch', not 'NetBSD 3.0'.

> | >| There are quite a few things in there that we'd need here and currently 
> | >| maintain as patches, like pawd and the changes to program mounts 
> | >| necessary for smb mounts. And what about netbsd-2?
> | >
> | >Definitely not in netbsd-2.
> | 
> | Why?
> 
> Well, not in a short time period and not for 2.1.

Again, I was talking about the netbsd-2 branch, not the release.

	hauke

-- 
/~\  The ASCII Ribbon Campaign                    Hauke Fath
\ /    No HTML/RTF in email	        Institut für Nachrichtentechnik
  X     No Word docs in email	                  TU Darmstadt
/ \  Respect for open standards              Ruf +49-6151-16-3281