Subject: Re: Location of "named.conf" (was: CVS commit: src)
To: Matthias Scheler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Luke Mewburn <lukem@NetBSD.org>
Date: 09/12/2005 16:54:56
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:05:41PM +0000, Matthias Scheler wrote:
| In article <20050907102010.GH24294@dmath5.geometrie.tuwien.ac.at>,
| Thomas Klausner <wiz@NetBSD.org> writes:
| >> No, it will not because "etc" isn't touched by default.
| > Just for the record: "postinstall fix" removes the file.
| Hmm ...
| > I'm not sure we want that...
| Probably not. But if we don't mark it as obsolete it won't be removed
| in a build with "MKUPDATE" and we'll get build failures. Adding a
| compatiblity symlink would fix that. But is that an good reason
| to create one?
postinstall supports relocating files, where the old location
is marked as obsolete in the set list. Infact, that's why postinstall
was invented (because sshd(8)'s config file moved directory & was renamed)
Please send me mail (or submit a PR) with the details of what's
changed and I'll look at adding a check/fix to postinstall.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----