Subject: Re: Location of "named.conf" (was: CVS commit: src)
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Matthias Scheler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/07/2005 22:05:41
In article <20050907102010.GH24294@dmath5.geometrie.tuwien.ac.at>,
Thomas Klausner <wiz@NetBSD.org> writes:
>> No, it will not because "etc" isn't touched by default.
> Just for the record: "postinstall fix" removes the file.
> I'm not sure we want that...
Probably not. But if we don't mark it as obsolete it won't be removed
in a build with "MKUPDATE" and we'll get build failures. Adding a
compatiblity symlink would fix that. But is that an good reason
to create one?
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/