On Jan 14,  4:49pm, Rui Paulo wrote:
} On 2005.08.24 13:28:30 +0000, John Nemeth wrote:
} | On Jan 14, 10:01am, Rui Paulo wrote:
} | } On 2005.08.24 16:18:25 +0000, Zafer Aydogan wrote:
} | } | I wonder why lib/30923 is still open in 3.99.8
} | } | A patch was provided.
} | } | This should be pulled up to 2.1, where the same problem is far more e=
} xplicit
} | } | and tells me that root login is refused for root, when supplied with =
} the
} | } | correct root passwort.
} | }=20
} | } 2.1 doesn't have PAM. What about 3.0_BETA ?
} |=20
} |      PAM went in before the branch, so 3.0 will have it.
} 
} I was not asking if 3.0_BETA has PAM, I was asking if it has the problem.

     Since neither of the bugs in question have been fixed in -current,
they won't be fixed on any branches.

}-- End of excerpt from Rui Paulo