Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re:_lib/30923?=
To: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@NetBSD.org>
From: Zafer Aydogan <zafer@gmx.org>
List: current-users
Date: 08/24/2005 16:34:15 
> 2.1 doesn't have PAM. What about 3.0_BETA ?

I know. But it is the same Problem without PAM.
Should be pulled up for 3.0BETA aswell.

I haven't filed a PR for 2.0 yet.

Z.