Subject: Re: build.sh and -U confusion
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Matthias Scheler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/13/2005 11:43:38
In article <20050810210417.BD6F25283@fnord.ir.bbn.com>,
Greg Troxel <email@example.com> writes:
> I ended up with a system with files in e.g. /usr/bin owned by gdt,
> with no suid bits. netstat didn't work, and I think sshd didn't
> start. While I realize this was my fault, it would be nice if
> ./build.sh install without -U errored out if the build had METALOG
Good idea. What about this:
1.) "./build.sh" refuses to build into a destination directory without a
meta log if "-U" is used.
2.) "./build.sh" refuses to build into a destination directory with a
meta log if "-U" is not used.
3.) "./build.sh" checks whether there is a meta log in the destination
directory and does The Right Thing(TM).
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/