Subject: Re: pf status
To: Marcin Jessa <email@example.com>
From: Pavel Cahyna <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/29/2005 15:24:44
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:56:46 +0200, Marcin Jessa wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:49:00 -0700
> email@example.com (John Nemeth) wrote:
>> From what I've read in the past, I don't believe that CARP is an
>> implementation of VRRP, but rather a home brewed protocol designed to
>> serve a similar purpose.
> CARP works great.
> Please read http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/carp.html for more info.
> You're of course entitled to have your own opinion, even based on some loose rumours,
> but I suggest you to test it yourself first and then make up your mind.
Why should anybody test it just to tell if it is a home brewed protocol or
not? And how is the fact that it "works great" relevant to this
discussion? One might rather want to see some documentation, which is
BTW if you have experience with CARP, could you please explain why a
kernel implementation is desirable, and how is it related to the pf