Subject: Re: pf status
To: John Nemeth <email@example.com>
From: Marcin Jessa <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/29/2005 13:56:46
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:49:00 -0700
email@example.com (John Nemeth) wrote:
> On Dec 19, 6:50am, Marcin Jessa wrote:
> } On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 03:01:14 -0700 firstname.lastname@example.org (John Nemeth) wrote:
> } > On Dec 18, 6:53am, Marcin Jessa wrote:
> } > }
> } > } I was also wondering if anyone is working on kernel implementation of CARP.
> } >
> } > Personally, I think we should do something like VRRP, which is
> } > standards compliant, instead of using NIH stuff that will have limited
> } > compatibility.
> } CARP is free implementation of VRRP which CISCO claims rights to.
> From what I've read in the past, I don't believe that CARP is an
> implementation of VRRP, but rather a home brewed protocol designed to
> serve a similar purpose.
CARP works great.
Please read http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/carp.html for more info.
You're of course entitled to have your own opinion, even based on some loose rumours,
but I suggest you to test it yourself first and then make up your mind.