Subject: Re: ../../../../net/files.pf:16: syntax error
To: Martin Husemann <email@example.com>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/15/2005 09:07:48
On Jul 15, 9:17am, email@example.com (Martin Husemann) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: ../../../../net/files.pf:16: syntax error
| Seconded, for closely related userland and /usr/src - but this issue was
| 2.0.x userland and config(8) being too old for the new kernel source. An
| in-depth explanation would have enabled the user to manualy update everything
| in the right order, but instead the shortcut "use build.sh" was given. IMHO
| that was a reasonable reaction (and generally a good advice "if in doubt").
I think that the instructions in UPDATING should have worked (or close to
worked). Yes, I agree the advice "use build.sh" was the most appropriate.