Subject: Re: using a PCIB made before written history? (Intel 82426EX PCI-to-ISA Bridge)
To: Jeremy C. Reed <>
From: Quentin Garnier <>
List: current-users
Date: 07/02/2005 11:53:03
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jul 02, 2005 at 02:33:08AM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Martin Husemann wrote:
> >>pci0: i/o space, memory space enabled, rd/line, rd/mult, wr/inv ok
> >>Intel 82426EX PCI-to-ISA Bridge (PCIB) (miscellaneous prehistoric,=20
> >>revision
> >>0x02) at pci0 dev 5 function 0 not configured
> >
> >Did you remove "pcib* at pci?" from your kernel config?
> This is GENERIC from netbsd-2-0-2-RELEASE (for i386). I didn't remove it=
> and I see it is there.

I guess our pcib(4) doesn't match that one.

> >But maybe you do not explicitly need an isa bus (i.e. if you have all yo=
> >legacy devices [like pckbc, npx, ...] attached via acpi)
> I am not sure if I know what that means. The kernel output doesn't say=20
> anything about "acpi" and appears all commented out in GENERIC.

You get isa0 at mainbus?, anyway, so it doesn't matter much.  I don't think
that LPC bridge has any special feature pcib(4) would enable anyway.

Quentin Garnier - -
"When I find the controls, I'll go where I like, I'll know where I want
to be, but maybe for now I'll stay right here on a silent sea."
KT Tunstall, Silent Sea, Eye to the Telescope, 2004.

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)