Subject: Re: Sane /etc/pam.d defaults (was: Pam and Current)
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Bernd Ernesti <email@example.com>
Date: 06/22/2005 22:31:42
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 04:10:05PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> On Jun 22, 9:50pm, firstname.lastname@example.org (Bernd Ernesti) wrote:
> -- Subject: Sane /etc/pam.d defaults (was: Pam and Current)
> | Ok, /usr/lib/security needs to exists, but for /etc/pam.d we really need
> | to add same sane default configuration compiled in if /etc/pam.d doesn't
> | exists at all or it is empty (maybe also if the requested file is missing).
> | We will have more an more reports coming in after 3.0 is out if that isn't
> | fixed before.
> Look is supposed to be fixing postinstall to handle it.
No, not in postinstall. This should be be fixed in another way, like compiled
in default values.