Subject: Re: addicmp.o error while building release
To: None <>
From: Alessandro Manunza <>
List: current-users
Date: 05/19/2005 01:51:27
Hi boyz

>I fixed this in head.

It seems me you have changed include "ctype.h" with <ctype.h> (isn't it?)
but I get the same error.

I was very very very tired training to compile and building and releasing
all the times ALL the NetBSD on my Pentium 500MHz :s, waiting 3 or 4 or
perhaps 5 hours, and than getting all the times the same error addicmp. bla
bla bla.....

So I start giving directly the error-generating command and I get the same
error in about 1 or 2 seconds :D:D

The command is:

 /usr/src/../tools/bin/i386--netbsdelf-gcc -O2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-traditional
-Wno-uninitialized  -Werror    -I/usr/src/dist/ipf -I/usr/src/dist/ipf/tools
-I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/dist/ipf -I/usr/src/sys/dist/ipf/netinet
-DSTATETOP -D__UIO_EXPOSE   -nostdinc -isystem
/usr/src/../obj/destdir.i386/usr/include -c
/usr/src/dist/ipf/lib/addicmp.c -o addicmp.o.tmp

And after run I get:
# /usr/src/../tools/bin/i386--netbsdelf-gcc...........ecc ecc (command)
/usr/src/dist/ipf/lib/addicmp.c: In function `addicmp':
/usr/src/dist/ipf/lib/addicmp.c:39: warning: implicit declaration of
function `ISDIGIT'

Wow!! Now the debugging is much more simple!!

I locate ctype.h:

# locate ctype.h

I tried :
# cp /usr/include/ctype.h  /usr/src/dist/ipf/lib/ctype
Coping ctype.h in the directory were addicmp is, but I get the same error.

But a question torments me more than others:
It's possible that I'm the only one getting this error?!?!
All the others compile all the release without this problem?
Than I think: 'what I made that the others don't?!?'
And here is the answer: a few days ago, I tried to compile the ipf source,
downloaded from the official site, running a 'make netbsd' & 'make
install-netbsd' or something like these. After this (not good end)
operation, I install a new full snapshot (20050506), hoping to overwriting
the previous operation, but perhaps it in not so!!

I will think...

Any in the previous message... in VERY welcomed :P