Subject: more ipmon
To: None <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: Rick Kelly <rmk@toad.rmkhome.com>
List: current-users
Date: 05/16/2005 01:27:22
The second dump below seems kind of strange to me.
Kdump from a recent x86 -current:
316 ipmon EMUL "netbsd"
316 ipmon CALL ioctl(4,FIONREAD,0xbfbfce00)
316 ipmon GIO fd 4 read 4 bytes
"\0\0\0\0"
316 ipmon RET ioctl 0
316 ipmon CALL nanosleep(0xbfbfcda8,0xbfbfcda0)
316 ipmon RET nanosleep 0
316 ipmon CALL ioctl(4,FIONREAD,0xbfbfce00)
316 ipmon GIO fd 4 read 4 bytes
"\0\0\0\0"
316 ipmon RET ioctl 0
316 ipmon CALL nanosleep(0xbfbfcda8,0xbfbfcda0)
316 ipmon RET nanosleep 0
316 ipmon CALL ioctl(4,FIONREAD,0xbfbfce00)
316 ipmon GIO fd 4 read 4 bytes
"\0\0\0\0"
316 ipmon RET ioctl 0
316 ipmon CALL nanosleep(0xbfbfcda8,0xbfbfcda0)
316 ipmon RET nanosleep 0
316 ipmon CALL ioctl(4,FIONREAD,0xbfbfce00)
316 ipmon GIO fd 4 read 4 bytes
"\0\0\0\0"
Kdump from the sparc5 running -current:
26519 ipmon EMUL "netbsd"
26519 ipmon RET nanosleep 0, -268448808/0xefffcbd8
26519 ipmon CALL ioctl(3,FIONREAD,0xefffcc54)
26519 ipmon GIO fd 3 read 4 bytes
"\0\0\0\0"
26519 ipmon RET ioctl 0, 1074030207/0x4004667f
26519 ipmon CALL nanosleep(0xefffcbe0,0xefffcbd8)
26519 ipmon RET nanosleep 0, -268448808/0xefffcbd8
26519 ipmon CALL ioctl(3,FIONREAD,0xefffcc54)
26519 ipmon GIO fd 3 read 4 bytes
"\0\0\0\0"
26519 ipmon RET ioctl 0, 1074030207/0x4004667f
26519 ipmon CALL nanosleep(0xefffcbe0,0xefffcbd8)
26519 ipmon RET nanosleep 0, -268448808/0xefffcbd8
26519 ipmon CALL ioctl(3,FIONREAD,0xefffcc54)
26519 ipmon GIO fd 3 read 4 bytes
"\0\0\0\0"
26519 ipmon RET ioctl 0, 1074030207/0x4004667f
26519 ipmon CALL nanosleep(0xefffcbe0,0xefffcbd8)
26519 ipmon RET nanosleep 0, -268448808/0xefffcbd8
26519 ipmon CALL ioctl(3,FIONREAD,0xefffcc54)
26519 ipmon GIO fd 3 read 4 bytes
"\0\0\0\0"
--
Rick Kelly rmk@rmkhome.com
<http://www.rmkhome.com/>
<http://rkba.rmkhome.com/> - the right to keep and bear arms
<http://wolf.rmkhome.com/> - firearm forums