Subject: Re: vnconfig is broken
To: None <>
From: Christos Zoulas <>
List: current-users
Date: 05/10/2005 16:13:03
In article <>,
Chris Ross  <> wrote:
>Denis Lagno wrote:
>> On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:50:51PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer scribed:
>>>Make sure you don't have a file called vnd0 or vnd0d in the current directory.
>> bingo!:)
>> I'm going to use cgd atop vnd, and vnd0d in the current directory is
>file with cgd parameters..
>   Now to ask the next question.  Is it sensible for vnconfig
>to look for a device in the cwd?  Why would one ever *want*
>this behavior?

Because it will be surprising if it did not. If you really wanted
to do it, how would you specify it? "./vnd0"? It is like having "test"
somewhere in your path before /bin and then wanting /bin/sh to DTRT.