Subject: Re: HEADS UP: ACPI-CA 20050408 imported to -current
To: Quentin Garnier <email@example.com>
From: Vincent <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/09/2005 12:21:37
Thanks Quentin for summarizing all this. I've been pretty busy
elsewhere, so there is a while I havn't put my nose into acpi stuff.
Yet, on my behalf, my basic need would be to access a userland variable
capable of changing dynamically processor performance (C states and
> Ultimately this calls for an interface design, because there
> is much more than what the processor object provides. Support for
> _PSV in the thermal zone objects needs some kind of a bus in order
> to control the processor, for example.
Question : the ACPI tree is already written in hardware. What you
suggest is, according to what I see, like rebuilding the same tree at
another level. Is that really efficient?