Subject: Re: Tab completion in /bin/sh
To: NetBSD-current Discussion List <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Rick Kelly <email@example.com>
Date: 05/05/2005 19:44:32
Greg A. Woods said:
>"pdksh" really doesn't differ that much from ATT Ksh, esp. not from the
>versions that were most widely distributed with other proprietary
>operating systems for a very long time, especially when it comes to
>running scripts. Even my Ksh-specific login scripts, long developed
>exclusively with ATT Ksh, work well with pdksh (though that may be my
>bent towards writing portable scripts showing through again :-).
And it looks like most commercial uses are ksh88 rather than ksh93. They
have put a lot of baggage into ksh93 as part of the AST suite.
Rick Kelly firstname.lastname@example.org
<http://rkba.rmkhome.com/> - the right to keep and bear arms
<http://wolf.rmkhome.com/> - firearm forums