Subject: Re: trouble with 10baseT autoselect on wm0
To: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <tih@eunetnorge.no>
From: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
List: current-users
Date: 04/27/2005 22:09:02
--r7tUYVWcdYzDJoZW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 08:35:10PM +0200, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo wrote:
> I have one of those laptops as well. I haven't tried it at 10 Mbps,
> but I had to quit letting it autoselect against our Cisco GigE capable
> switch, because it would negotiate 1 Gbps and full duplex -- after
> trying for about two minutes. Every time something happened to the
> interface, such as me putting it into promiscuous mode with tcpdump,
> there would be another two minute wait for the autoselect.
that's normal CatOS behaviour. if you want to avoid this expensive
autonegotiation, set the port to "switchport nonegotiate"
nonegotiate Device will not engage in negotiation protocol on this
interface
regards,
--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@{NetBSD,Xtrmntr,silcnet}.org> --
--r7tUYVWcdYzDJoZW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFCb/FeiwjDDlS8cmMRAhKEAJ4/lru8xvjt4sfmLa7m1Tii1tvfEgCcDZAD
yJsiGUceF56ZLH7mt8yQX1E=
=5sdT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--r7tUYVWcdYzDJoZW--