Subject: Re: [HEADS-UP] IPsec NAT Traversal fixes
To: Emmanuel Dreyfus <>
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <>
List: current-users
Date: 04/23/2005 12:34:13
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 04:22:24PM +0200, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> I'll now work on NAT-T for FAST_IPSEC. Why do we have two IPsec
> implementations, BTW?

Because FAST_IPSEC, while vastly better in other respects, doesn't
do IPv6.  If that were fixed, we could junk the old IPsec code.

 Thor Lancelot Simon	                            

"The inconsistency is startling, though admittedly, if consistency is to be
 abandoned or transcended, there is no problem."		- Noam Chomsky