On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 11:37:00AM +0100, Chris Wareham wrote:
> reasons (bloat being the one that springs to mind) why it would be

I think that /bin/sh is just for scripts, and root/emergancy use. OTOH, it is
not statically linked and supports emacs/vi (?) editing, anyway, so "why not?".

Of course it would be neat to make /bin/sh a /bin/sh and redirect users to 
/bin/ksh ;)  


Just my 2 cents