Subject: Re: getpw*_r standards
To: Greywolf <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Luke Mewburn <lukem@NetBSD.org>
Date: 04/12/2005 12:41:06
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 07:14:41PM -0700, Greywolf wrote:
| Does Solaris exhibit this behaviour?
AFAICT, Solaris doesn't support +@netgroup.
| Question: Would it make sense at all to have the get*() as wrappers
| around get*_r(), or are get*() sufficiently set in stone that there
| would be no gain by doing so? (Probably the latter; I was just thinking
| along the lines of any new development, though I suspect that new stuff
| would be made reentrant by default...)
The use of get*_r() for "iterative" lookups doesn't solve the problem;=20
the "lookup cursor" is still per process not per invocation.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----