Subject: Re: experiments with lfs
To: Daniel Carosone <email@example.com>
From: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/09/2005 16:45:10
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Daniel Carosone wrote:
>> Wasn't the point of LFS to not require a time-consuming fsck-run?
> Sure, fsck -p (which runs at boot) just does a roll-forward, and is
> I wanted to do a full check, to make sure the kernel and fsck agreed
> (since there have been arguments between them in the past :) - that
> was what was slow.
Ah. Is/can the full consistency check be ran after mounting the
filesystem, sort of in the background, to ensure everything's ok?
Or does one have to wait until problems show up, and then run it manually?
NetBSD - Free AND Open! (And of course secure, portable, yadda yadda)