Subject: Re: experiments with lfs
To: Hubert Feyrer <email@example.com>
From: Daniel Carosone <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/09/2005 17:22:47
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 02:04:53AM +0200, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> Wasn't the point of LFS to not require a time-consuming fsck-run?
Sure, fsck -p (which runs at boot) just does a roll-forward, and is
I wanted to do a full check, to make sure the kernel and fsck agreed
(since there have been arguments between them in the past :) - that
was what was slow.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----