Subject: Re: experiments with lfs
To: Daniel Carosone <current-users@NetBSD.org, email@example.com>
From: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/09/2005 02:04:53
In article <20050406023846.GJ21848@bcd.geek.com.au> you wrote:
> Until then, it seemed to behave flawlessly, and certainly worked
> better than the last time I tried it. Before filling it, I unmounted
> it and ran a fsck_lfs, which came up clean (though it took a *very*
> long time and seemed to be heavily CPU bound, I'll try and do some profiling
> of it at some point later to figure out where its spinning).
Wasn't the point of LFS to not require a time-consuming fsck-run?
___ _ _ _ _ * Harddisk Image Cloning *
/ __| | || | | | www.feyrer.de/g4u/
| (_ |_ _| |_| |
\___| |_| \___/ Version 2.0 out now!