Subject: Re: bce and iwi problems
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Phil Nelson <phil@cs.wwu.edu>
List: current-users
Date: 04/08/2005 11:41:43
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 07 April 2005 22:56, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> I think those are a Broadcom chip, and unlikely to be supported
> anytime in the forseeable future. =A0It is, however, a mini-pci card and
> can be replaced with another iwi or ath or whatever else is supported,
> if you wanted to.
Ok, I have the same problem ... and liked this solution .... but I found it=
=20
quite frustrating to find a card that would work. I wanted a 802.11b/g=20
mini-PCI to replace the current Broadcom mini-PCI 802.11b/g .... but even=20
consulting the web site and the wi(4) didn't seem to help much. =20
=46or example, does anyone know if the "Intel=AE PRO/Wireless 2915ABG Netwo=
rk=20
Connection (802.11a/b/g)" or the "Intel=AE PRO/Wireless 2200BG Network=20
Connection (802.11b/g)" cards are supported by -current?
If not, is there a specific product that does 802.11b/g that someone can=20
recommend as working with -current?
Thanks.
=2D --Phil
=2D --=20
Phil Nelson NetBSD: http://www.netbsd.org
e-mail: phil@cs.wwu.edu Coda: http://www.coda.cs.cmu.edu
http://www.cs.wwu.edu/nelson=20
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFCVtBszbodwsP3RI0RAnWxAJ46w1ztkPBbT16B/vO/SjHD3zKhewCfRlTQ
lKat/4tQSR06EPIaMMRAqQw=3D
=3Db0lS
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----