Subject: Re: Why not softdep per default?
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: David Young <dyoung@pobox.com>
List: current-users
Date: 03/30/2005 17:22:58
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 09:58:50PM +0000, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> In article <424968D9.8080607@tecneeq.de>,
> 	Karsten Kruse <tecneeq@tecneeq.de> writes:
> > But i don't see why it should not be possible to change sysinst to use
> > softdep on the ports where it is expected to work.
> 
> Is there such a port? It doesn't even work stable on NetBSD-i386,
> see PR kern/26435.

Just to corroborate that there is no such port, see kern/28621.

Dave

-- 
David Young             OJC Technologies
dyoung@ojctech.com      Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933