Subject: Re: Why not softdep per default?
To: Jeremy C. Reed <reed@reedmedia.net>
From: Rick Kelly <rmk@toad.rmkhome.com>
List: current-users
Date: 03/29/2005 22:29:12
Jeremy C. Reed said:
>Except the root / file system. FreeBSD sysinstall doesn't use softupdates
>for / by default. At first because of reliability concerns (if I remember
>correctly), but now because softupdates benefit of faster write access
>doesn't make much sense on a filesystem that is rarely written too (since
>sysinstall creates /tmp and /var and home on separate partitions).
walrus# df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/da0s1a 253678 54304 179080 23% /
devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev
/dev/da0s1e 253678 12 233372 0% /tmp
/dev/da0s1f 7678652 1896490 5167870 27% /usr
/dev/da0s1d 253678 10086 223298 4% /var
For some reason they like /usr/home.
--
Rick Kelly rmk@rmkhome.com
<http://www.rmkhome.com/>
<http://rkba.rmkhome.com/> - the right to keep and bear arms
<http://wolf.rmkhome.com/> - firearm forums