In article <20050317190241.GA23679@netbsd.org>,
Bill Studenmund  <wrstuden@netbsd.org> wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:00:35AM -0800, Aaron J. Grier wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 11:40:01PM +0100, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>> 
>> > Except that if I understood things correctly, it will not be 2.1, but
>> > 3.0?  There aren't any minor releases anymore. Corrections for 2.0
>> > will be 2.1 and so on, but development work goes towards 3.0.
>> 
>> then what's this 2.0.1, then?
>
>3.0 will be the next main release, with lots of new stuff in it.
>
>2.1 is 2.0 plus security fixes plus some new features from current.
>
>2.0.1 is 2.0 plus security fixes.
>
>I think the idea is that 2.X.Y releases will be a very simple upgrade from 
>2.X.0 (like even binary update if we had everything together). 2.X will be 
>minor feature (new drivers, self-contained other features) updates from 
>2.0.
>
>Like I believe the statvfs changes are in 2-STABLE. They are a useful 
>thing, so they were pulled in from -current. They however are a bit 
>disruptive, so they aren't in 2.0.1 or 2.0.2...

Yes, that was the general idea. But nobody to my knowledge has pulled
the statvfs stuff to 2-STABLE.

christos