On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:29:52AM -0600, James Chacon wrote:
> > Labelling it as a beta of the 2.0 release is even worse.
> 
> It's not a beta of 2.0. It's 2.0 "stable".
> 
> Where stable means "post 2.0, not yet 2.1" (same as it did for 1.6)

So "2.0.1_STABLE" would be much better because it has all the changes
which were in NetBSD 2.0.1. And as soon as 2.0.2 is tagged it should
be renamed to 2.0.2_STABLE.

	Kind regards

-- 
Matthias Scheler                                  http://scheler.de/~matthias/