Subject: Re: scheduler woes on MPACPI kernel
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Thomas Bieg <email@example.com>
Date: 01/18/2005 16:34:33
J Chapman Flack schrieb:
> Right. It also clearly says "The historic -increment option has been
> deprecated but is still supported in this implementation," which means
> nice -20 lowers priority, and nice --20 raises it.
Ok, it seems to be important which "nice" we are talking about.
I did a quick test and it looks like "/usr/bin/nice -20" does indeed
lower the priority, while the csh/tcsh builtins raise it. sh/ksh don't
seem to have "nice" builtins, and I don't have bash or any other shell
installed to try there.