Subject: Re: scheduler woes on MPACPI kernel
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: J Chapman Flack <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/18/2005 09:46:34
Lubomir Sedlacik wrote:
> not really, -20 is the highest priority, 20 is the lowest. the manual
> page is pretty clear on the subject.
Right. It also clearly says "The historic -increment option has been
deprecated but is still supported in this implementation," which means
nice -20 lowers priority, and nice --20 raises it.